There’s no argument that the Internet is one of the backbones of the modern world today. Yet, it seems that we are heading toward the end of the open Internet on the long run; An Internet that respects the user privacy & security, and protects him both from censorship and tracking seems to be long gone. The future is yet to become darker with corporations gaining more power.

If you are someone interested in online privacy and security, then you need to understand all these dynamics together, as many independent forces each doing their best to serve their own interests rather than a linear set of factors happening at specific points in time. Just like you try to understand history as social, economic, political, religious and scientific factors, you should try to understand how the dynamics are working today to sum in total to destroy the open Internet.

There’s no secret Illuminati-supported foundation to destroy the Internet, it’s just the combination of governments, spy agencies, and giant corporations putting their hands on it each by its own. We are going to see why this is the case.

Treacherous Regulations

Governments all around the world have been working lately on making new laws and regulations related to the Internet. Sadly most of these weren’t actually helpful for online privacy and security, but rather to allow censorship and giant corporations profiting. Some of these laws even break the very essential nature of the Internet.

One of these is what’s called “upload filters & link tax”, which is an ongoing regulation in EU and about to pass very soon. It is a disaster for the Internet:

Upload Filters & Link Tax


The regulation here makes every website legally responsible for all the content on they are hosting, and gives them only a period of 1 hour to remove illegal content before they become accountable for it, despite that they are not the original creators for that content. The regulation wants all websites to filter the content BEFORE it gets published on the platform, not after it.

In order to do that, the regulation asks all Internet websites to implement upload filters, which must check every single piece of uploaded content, whether it was text, video, audio, code or any other format for any copyrighted materials/illegal ones, and block them from being published.

This would break the Internet1)Julia Reda – Upload Filters: , because for example Facebook, YouTube, Reddit, +Google, SnapChat, WhatsApp and many other services are dealing with hundreds of millions of users per day. It’s practically impossible for Facebook for example to review every post, every image, every video and every single activity done by the user before it gets published on Facebook. The Internet won’t be able to function under such law. Startup companies will need to implement cutting-edge technology to filter all the content, and creators will find it practically impossible to do any meaningful activity on the Internet.

If you think that the previous regulation as a disaster, then wait to hear this one: Link Tax regulation will require anybody showing a “preview” of any journalistic article/document on the Internet, to first get a license from the publisher.

This means that any website like Facebook or Google, which do show a preview of any link available there before opening it, will need to obtain a license from the publishers of that document/article, and this applies to every single one of them in the entire world. This doesn’t only apply to large services, but anyone who writes online articles, like bloggers, will need to get a license for just linking to some other websites. Scientists and researchers who base their work on web scrapping will need to stop all their activities2)Julia Reda: Extra Copyright for News Sites:

Both of these regulations have gained majority support in the EU Parliament early voting phase3)EU approves controversial Copyright Directive, including internet ‘link tax’ and ‘upload filter’:, and a final vote before these regulations go into action is to be held at March, 2019.

Assistance and Access Bill


Australia, as usual, went to another level. The Australian Parliament has approved4)Australia anti-encryption law rushed to passage: a bill known as “Assistance and Access Bill”, which requires tech companies working in Australia to implement weaknesses and vulnerabilities in its systems, including encryption, to allow law authorities in Australia to gain access to people’ data whenever it needs in cases of terrorism or child porn and other issues.

This regulation is a disaster because first, it will make any Australian-based tech company vulnerable to hackers from the outside. And secondly, it breaks everything related to privacy and security: The right of information to be stored safely, and the right that no one should be allowed to break the user’s privacy5)An Open Letter to Bill Shorten from the Tech Community:

The tech industry in Australia is still in shock after such regulation was passed.

Other Regulations

The famous Net Neutrality regulation, which was introduced in 2015 in the US, forced ISPs to consider all the data passing through them as equal; Preventing from from offering different subscription models for various Internet services, and also preventing (theoretically) from slowing/limiting access to certain services or websites.

However, in 2017, the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) ruled to cancel the Net Neutrality regulation, and to re-allow ISPs to do the previous manipulations they were prevented from doing for two years. As a counter practice, some states like California, implemented their own Net Neutrality rules again, but most of the states in the US remain without any regulations to protect customers.

Talking about censorship, the US is probably the best nation on Earth to apply it. The PRISM project, which Edward Snowden exploited, allowed security agencies in the US such as the CIA, NSA and the FBI to access data related to any technology company located in the US and their customers (including foreigners). No data in the US is safe.

Less Competition = More Monopoly


Just 2 days ago, Microsoft announced6)Microsoft Edge: Making the web better through more open source collaboration: that its famous closed-source Edge browser, will detach its old proprietary engine “EdgeHTML”, and switch to a Chromium-based engine. Normally, this should’ve been great news; More open-source code is used and less fragmentation exists for developers working on developing websites. Who wouldn’t be happy that Internet Explorer’s heir is gone?

However, it turns out that the death of this absolutely horrible engine is actually worse than its existence in the first place. Chromium is developed mainly by Google, and does whatever it wants with it. If Edge is to also use Chromium’s engine (called Blink, which is a fork of WebKit), then Internet users will be left with mainly two rendering engines: Blink from Google and Gecko from Mozilla.

According to the latest statistics from NetMarketShare7)NetMarketShare Desktop Stats: , 61.75% of the global browsers market share (desktop) belongs to Chrome, with only 4.92% for Firefox:


Internet Explorer is still accounting for 11% of the market, while Edge controls 4.34%, so in total, Microsoft controls around 15%. Internet Explorer is set to be disconnected8)Frequently Asked Questions – Edge: when both Windows 7 and 8.1 reach their end life span, after that, Microsoft will stop updating it with any kind of patches (including security). Users then will have to upgrade to Windows 10 to use Edge (Edge is only available for Window 10).

If this 15% of the browsers market share is to be gradually added to Chrome/Chromium, then it will account for 75% by itself. Mozilla fears9)Goodbye, EdgeHTML – Mozilla Blog: that this will add more power to Google, and may take us back to the browser wars age, where certain websites were only functional on one browser, but not the other.

After few years, Firefox users may find their selves just like Linux users; An extremely tiny portion of overall users, then why should anyone bother supporting their own software/websites/services on it?

Many people may think that this is only a technical issue related to rendering engines, but it’s not. Rendering engines are the kernels of all these web browsers. Mozilla, as a foundation, is way advanced in terms of respecting the user privacy than Google. If Mozilla is to face financial breakdowns due to shrinking user base and nonsupporting websites for their engine, then it may collapse. If the latter happens, we’ll be left with nobody to care for our privacy in the browsers world, and it will drag with it many other privacy and security projects which Mozilla is currently supporting. Tor Browser for example is based entirely on Firefox.

Privacy is Dead


I’ve been researching a lot lately on digital privacy and security for individuals, as a result I’ve put my hands on tens of research papers related to the topic, but and the more you read, the more you discover that the amount of ways in which companies, governments and security agencies can crack the privacy of everybody is astonishing. To protect yourself, you’d have to:

  1. Have very good level of security/privacy awareness, and general understanding of computer science.
  2. You need to limit your usage of social websites, apps and online services.
  3. Secure your DNS requests (encrypted DNS).
  4. Secure your connection between you and the website/person you are trying to contact with (VPN/SSH Tunnel).
  5. Use a good encryption method for your files or any sensitive data.
  6. Make sure all the files you delete are actually deleted.
  7. Remove all social apps from your phone, and anything which requires a permission to get to your files/media/microphone/camera.. (I found that all my photos once were uploaded to +Google, without my consent, without even giving the permissions myself since it was preinstalled, I had no idea until it was stolen and I discovered I still have my photos).
  8. You also need to use a good email service like ProtonMail if you want to secure your emails.
  9. You also need to tweak your browser’s privacy settings and install tons of extensions to protect you (Disable ads, trackers, cookies, and make sure everything is HTTPS, also prevent user-fingerprinting, canvas-fingerprinting and user-agent matching).
  10. You need to tweak your operating system and make sure it’s not leaking data or phoning home.
  11. You also need to make sure your router and wireless communications are secure.
  12. Sometimes your hardware itself may be compromised (Meltdown/Spectre for Intel processors, and every single old smart phone that the vendor company won’t update after a year or so since its release).
  13. You need to secure physical access to your devices.
  14. You need to find a clever way to prevent side-channels attacks. Probably you won’t.
  15. There’s no way for you to know whether a software you use has an unknown zero-day vulnerability that was discovered by a security agency, and then sold for your government for millions of dollars just to spy on you.
  16. Many other attack factors that you can’t even imagine.

Almost 99% of all users can’t do these things and won’t. If a company or a government is after your data, they’ll probably get it at this point. Yes, having many security features at your pocket is better than having none, but at the end of the day, a single unsecured query could damage you a lot depending on to what level you need to keep yourself safe.

The Business Model of the Internet

The very beginning of this article requests you kindly to disable your adblocker. But if you do, tracking scripts of Google will be able to see you and display advertisements for you, which is very much against what this article is about. As a blogger, I see myself in a contradictory position: Telling you how bad and harmful ads and tracking scripts are, and at the same time, telling to you stop your adblock because this is the only way for us to pay the bills.

Advertisements are still one of the main business models of the Internet. Google, despite being a huge company with tons of services, gets more than 90% of its profit from ads alone10)How Google makes money: Facebook has a similar story too. Since these companies are offering the service for free, the only way to allow their selves to continue is by offering some aspects of users data for advertisers, thus, tracking continues and privacy related issues continue too.

If this method is to stop or breakdown, whether it was because of regulations or more users installing adblockers, then the way Internet works will change too; Internet Services such as Google Search, Facebook or YouTube will ask you for a monthly subscription to use their service. Online blogs, such as ours, will also require you to pay for each article you want to read (Big newspapers such as The Economist, Bloomberg and others are already doing this).

Poor people won’t find the Internet as useful as before, and the rich will get more rich while the poor will get poorer.


Having all of these factors running and working together is what makes us believe that dark days are coming.

We hope this post will be an alarm for all privacy & security advocates around the world to turn into action. Understand the risks of the Internet that we’re heading to, call your representatives and spread awareness about such issues and why they are important for all of us.

One day, I am afraid that I will look at my child and tell him:

Before you were born, we had an Internet where anybody could contact with anybody else in the entire world without being afraid of censorship, tracking and hijacking. We had a so decentralized Internet, that no government or company anywhere could control it alone. We had a great access to all kinds of knowledge we need in the world.. I miss those days!


1 Julia Reda – Upload Filters:
2 Julia Reda: Extra Copyright for News Sites:
3 EU approves controversial Copyright Directive, including internet ‘link tax’ and ‘upload filter’:
4 Australia anti-encryption law rushed to passage:
5 An Open Letter to Bill Shorten from the Tech Community:
6 Microsoft Edge: Making the web better through more open source collaboration:
7 NetMarketShare Desktop Stats:
8 Frequently Asked Questions – Edge:
9 Goodbye, EdgeHTML – Mozilla Blog:
10 How Google makes money:
3 Comment
MCbx December 12, 2018

About these ads, and a whole modern Internet, that’s not how the WWW was intended to work.
You had Your Internet account and there was a little folder called public_html in it. This folder had some quota and it was part of your Internet account, so you paid for this with Your Internet bill. Every HTML file You put there was publicly available in some specific address like http… (the letter for user name was a funny de facto standard for large providers). This gave all users equal possibility to both send and receive content, to be both producer and consumer. These sites were quite densely linked with each other, with hyperlinks as extensions to knowledge offered or sources for quotes, so it was easy to move between them. These links were done without payment from any side (and now not much people will link to you if you don’t pay them, even in citations which should contain link).
If you wanted your content to be licensed with some really absurd conditions – yes, you could do it, and you even had possibility to try to execute this license. It was still your stuff, contrary to modern “hostings” in media in which if you can select CC/NC you are in luck, usually you give all rights to provider. That’s how it was intended to work.
When this “public_html” service was discontinued, it was already known that the Internet will go the same way as amateur TV, where fees for publishing in this medium successfully prevented everyone except global corporations from doing it. But another nail to the coffin was put by open source developers. They took powerful servers bought for them by their bosses as granted for everyone, while commercial software for easy home web authoring was in decline, neglecting a nice opportunity to become an alternative.
This Internet was made by hackers – people who usually like to make something. Now the internet is made by accountants, who want financial gain from consumers, preventing consumers from producing as this would be competing to their organizations. Things invented by hackers are just incompatible with modern Internet. So if there are no hackers (as they mostly just got caught in overtime work trap), but accountants, why keep the Internet for these “makers”?
I wish I could propose some solutions, but, sorry, see how TV looks now, there is no solution. There won’t be hackers anymore, I think we will need just wait for a totally new technologies to be pioneered.
Or old ones to be destroyed.

noemata March 1, 2019

a gnu/linux user with a gnu/linux page he takes care of something like “privacy”. why is that so rare? while windows users are more and more sensitized to these facts, the encapsulated linux world only seems to be ignorant when it comes to these values, which stallman also exemplifies. for example when i address this topic in fedora/redhat/ibm (everything is now the same) forums, there is no reaction. they only take care of the code, but ethical questions (always connected with it) are pushed aside. the big silence.

exception: “selinux of course protects from everything. and we have firefox”. of course selinux has nothing at all to do with privacy/freedom and firefox is demonstrably a telemetry – monster (without a proper user.config) that even uses telemetry, if telemetry is used or is disabled. and this is only the top of the iceberg, if by default 2 policies apply (mozilla & google), you leave the security modules untouched.

but linux-distros/user doesn’t seem to care. mozilla is still shipped by default almost everywhere. or – under redhat/fedora/ibm – you also have your own chromium-fork with vaapi support, but completely non-unggogled. brave, iridium & other projects show that exactly this would be possible.

the os itself may be so “safe” and modern (ostree, transactional-updates, et cetera) but when it comes to the web itself, everything fails. and they know it, and yet nothing is done to secure that “interface” (a little bit).

and if you add the big silence, as well as PRISM facts and the fact that especially redhat/ibm has the us – government as a big buyer, it becomes clear why there’s just silcence. not even the quo-vadis certificate scandal was mentioned in the slightest. on the question of how to mistrust some certificates system-wide, again: big silence.

the beautiful new linux world including its nsa – sysadmins .. coming from windows, this ignorance is more than disturbing. of course, vpn, tor, pihole, adguard home, ungoogled-chromium browsers et cetera are there.

but none of this is a “solution” and none of this (even tor) is “secure”. privacy is dead. that’s probably true. and what do you coders/programmers do about it? obviously: nothing. without you intelligent (but ethically underdeveloped) coders/programmers, even the world’s most ghastly government couldn’t do anything to undermine freedom and privacy.

and not only redhat/fedora/ibm is affected by this criticism. nasty telemetry with ubuntu (& store), possible collaboration of suse with the nsa … . the big players in the linux – world are no better than microsoft, apple & co. . and the little distros are technically and optically mostly underdeveloped and based on their big nasty brothers.

it is the convenience of people, especially in the us, why nothing changes but only worsens. instead of a revolution after snowden’s revelations, there is only a relatively short “excitement” and senseless “demonstrations” (with a smartphone in the pocket).

stallman is a contracition, if he wants to “impose” “free” software on others, but he remains a visionary. very bad times. really.

Julian April 23, 2019

Privacy is not dead.
Internet freedom is not dead.
I seriously do not understand those who are panicking. Especially if they claim to be a fan of free software. The key to development in all systems is the unpleasant duty of facing challenges. And governments do their best to challenge their citizens.
The answer is already out there. Yes, VPN and TOR are good things but the real solution is blockchain technology. It will create an indestructible anonymous framework for the next internet. Not only for economic and financial purposes but for content sharing too. No one can stop it unless the internet itself will be destroyed.
Bureaucracy and tyranny only accelerate that progress instead of stopping it.

Get a VPN



Become a Supporter

For the price of one cup of coffee per month:

  • Support the FOSS Post to produce more content.
  • Get a special account on our website.
  • Remove all the ads you are seeing (including this one!).
  • Help us get to our goal of 100 supporters, to start many initiatives.

Opinions Column

Latest Distribution Reviews

Tools We Use